Department Meeting Minutes 6-25-08
2) Shelf labeling – Jennie reminded us that Outreach has offered to do laminated signs and wondered if we want them to do end range labels for the collection. This needs to be done, but the consensus was that we do this in-house rather than with Outreach. We may want directional signs later, after painting, that are useful and meaningful to customers.
3) Weekends (I think we may be set) – OK. We think that we will need a student on Sunday evenings this fall. The Research Desk Task Force is not moving forward quickly since ITS has joined the discussions. Perhaps sub-groups are needed. Computers for the public are a point of discussion along with use of Identikeys.
4) Motion sensor lights – Pat reported that on the weekends the lights in the stacks are not always turned on. Pat suggested that motion sensor lights would solve the problem. In the meantime, ask admin to have all the lights turned on each day at opening.
5) Shelve withs – Linda explained that when everything is under one call number except for a few volumes we post a sign that the volumes are shelved in another area. Jennie suggested that we change the call numbers on the few volumes. This will work except for items that have changed call numbers over time.
6) Maps for one-desk – before we can have someone work on a Map of office collections, we need to get everything moved to where it will go. It was reiterated that film cabinets cannot be located in the center of the room. Computers will go in the back of the office room between the pillars. There are lots of fiche to file and cabinets to move.
7) Y1s – We had cancelled the slip versions of the Serial Set. Sheila recommended that the “reports” remain cancelled but that the “documents” continue to be received. She read the definitions that indicate that the “documents” are much more substantial than the reports. The documents have their own item numbers. It was not recommended that the treaty documents be re-instated but the item number (0996-A) is the same for House, Senate and Treaty documents so that is not possible. It also was recommended that we *not* get the shipping list records for these items – only the full bib records. The question was whether we would get barcodes for items that we do not get shipping list records for. The question also was raised about what the volume of these documents is. It varies by Congress, but a check of Data Miner indicated about 1,000 items in a decade (or about 100 per year so it was decided to continue to get the Marcive shipping list records for these. Peggy will re-select the documents only for these items.
8) Legislative calendars – We get this in print and we keep getting paper accumulations then discard when we get the annual. The past year of print goes to PASCAL when the new annual is received. However, for fiche, we have not been discarding the fiche when the annual comes in. It is easier to deal with the paper because the catalog has a mechanism to deal with the issues. There is no such mechanism for fiche. It is not known how much space the fiche occupies. A look at the catalog indicates that there may be fiche of items for which there may be no print. The recommendation was to leave the fiche as is and continue our current practice. It was also recommended that we not be concerned about interim items in PASCAL until we have the need for space.
9) CDROMs for cdrom computers – There are few programs on the CD-ROM computers that still require a CD-ROM to run. Currently those CDs are in a little pile with sticky notes on them to *not* shelve on a shelf by the American State Papers. Is this the best place? There is a separate location code for govln and that code could be used for these CDs. The label in the catalog would be Gov Reference CD. It was decided to put them on a separate shelf (labeled) with the rest of the CDs. The commercial CDs that do not circulate could also be located on this shelf.
10)Hearings (duplicate records) Many hearings have duplicate records (2 or 3). This may be due to the fact that the records were purchased at one time for fiche that we were going to purchase – but did not. The duplicate records are creating a problem when creating lists. It may be possible to create a list of CIS records with no 001 tag, “CIS” in 099 and with no items attached. It was decided that Leanne needs to be part of this discussion. In the meantime, only staff will clean up records when handling the items for some other reason.
11)Short records – Related to the authority control work. Currently, when a short record is created it is coded as a y I the Cat Level which indicates it is “locally created.” This means there is no OCLC record for this item as well. Those coded “y” will not be sent for authority control. The suggestion is that we use a new code “w” for these records so that these records will be sent for authority control. There was discussion about changing the old records from “y” to “w” but it was decided that this would only be done by Cataloging.
12)Statistics – Peggy announced that we are coming up on time to provide statistics to ARL. She shared copies of previous statistics and asked if these statistics can be captured since the “position previously held by Martin” has been vacant for some time. Sheila and Linda agreed to look at this. There was a discussion about serials and how they were counted in the past. The numbers seem inflated. Many serials also may not be currently in publication. Linda will try a review file based on serials that have had a checkin update and/or item added in the last year.
13)Basement shelves – there was discussion of what is in the basement and what might need to go to the basement.
14)Microfiche AD – Pat brought up the issue of silver halide fiche filed along with fiche particularly in the Ds. She asked if there was any provision for separating the GPO fiche. There does not appear to be any. Pat will check the Ds and put the silver halide in a box on top of the cabinet.
15)When the “prince” position is filled we need to have a philosophical discussion of what constitutes a “good” record. We may need a template of what fields need to be included in a record. There was discussion of what the duties of this position will entail.
